Lord of the Rings: Return of the King PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Sunday, 11 September 2005 07:56
The final chapter of the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy has finally come to pass and it doesn't disappoint.  I didn't get around to reading Tolkien's books until after the "Fellowship of the Ring" came to theaters.  I was so impressed by the first film that I knew I had to read the books.  I went through all of them and loved every minute.  I tell you this so you know that I haven't been a devout Tolkien fan all my life but love the stories now.  The first two films were superb in my opinion although some parts did diverge from the original story.  "Return of the King" is by far the best of the films in the trilogy.  There are many parts that I wish had been included but I felt that overall Peter Jackson did a great job with the cuts.     The final chapter of the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy has finally come to pass and it doesn't disappoint.  I didn't get around to reading Tolkien's books until after the "Fellowship of the Ring" came to theaters.  I was so impressed by the first film that I knew I had to read the books.  I went through all of them and loved every minute.  I tell you this so you know that I haven't been a devout Tolkien fan all my life but love the stories now.  The first two films were superb in my opinion although some parts did diverge from the original story.  "Return of the King" is by far the best of the films in the trilogy.  There are many parts that I wish had been included but I felt that overall Peter Jackson did a great job with the cuts. 

BEWARE, THERE BE SPOILERS AHEAD. 

     So many movies have failed to keep the viewers caring for the characters in the sequels.  This is where ROTK stays on top.  Peter Jackson has brilliantly balanced continuing the story while at the same time making sure we still care what happens to the characters.  You may say that Peter Jackson had nothing to do with this as Tolkien wrote the story.  This in part is true but Peter Jackson takes some divergences from the book to ensure that we continue to care.  Although in one sense I would love to see the movie stick strictly to the book I think the changes made were important and made the movies far better in the end.

     So what big changes were made you ask?  There were a few that bothered me that I suspect will be fixed in the extended edition.  The first change was that Aragorn never confronts Sauron through the palantir.  This will most likely be in the extended version as it is only a small part that takes almost no time(which raises the question why wasn't it in the film?).  Another is that the palantir is found sitting in the water at the base of Saruman's tower.  The confrontation with Saruman never occurs.  This will be in the extended edition according to Peter Jackson.  The final major issue was that Gollum set Sam and Frodo against one another.  In the book this didn't occur, or at least not nearly as directly.

     Overall the movie was incredible and keeps you on the edge of your seat.  You feel happy, sad, scared, and anxious throughout the movie giving you more emotion than any movie that I can recall(short of the previous two LOTR movies).  The special effects are extraordinary.  You can't even tell Gollum is animated in the film.  The battle scenes are so believable that you really think people are being crushed by elephants.  The acting is perfect with each actor convincing you that they are the character they are playing.  Ian McKellen did an incredible job of playing the immensely powerful Gandalf.  In this movie you really get to see Gandalf's power as he repels the Nazgul, which was absolutely wild.  Of course I can't forget the music.  It is hard to believe that the music can really make the movie but it does.  The emotion you are supposed to be feeling is relayed through the music perfectly.  I have to say that although I am a "Matrix" freak this has become my favorite movie and the trilogy my favorite group of movies.

 
 

Sponsored Links